Barrydabusdriver said:
People keep referring to bus drivers and I'm not sure what they mean, is it a role?
if you read up on everything we've posted, we make it clear what a bus driver is
03/07/2016 14:02:21
Barrydabusdriver said:
People keep referring to bus drivers and I'm not sure what they mean, is it a role?
BattleDolphin said:
VOTE: Invisi I agree we do need to lynch someone, and it might be unfortunate that it's Invisi but honestly ewhatother option do we have
Pazx said:
BattleDolphin said:
VOTE: Invisi I agree we do need to lynch someone, and it might be unfortunate that it's Invisi but honestly ewhatother option do we have
We do actually have other options, the issue is that they aren't any more or less appealing than lynching Invisi.
Barry is also looking pretty kill-able.
LtLongshot said:
Really I'm uninclined to vote unless the quiet people post some more tbh.
SpaceJam said:
We gonna lynch invisi? I can get on board with that, especially with Longshots story.
VOTE: UNVOTE
VOTE: INVISI
(Halp i dont know if thats the right way of doing it)
Maribro said:
LtLongshot said:
Really I'm uninclined to vote unless the quiet people post some more tbh.
Not lynching benefits the mafia, I've come to learn this from playing the game
Urisk said:It was originally suggested that I should kill someone to prove innocence which I'm ok with if it against super sus people. Which is why I proposed a no lynch option, unfortunately going back now invis did look really sus with those previous comments. The problem is, I have 2 kills which I really don't want wasted, so far it is still possible but not plauseable that there is another Town NK player.
SpaceJam said:
We gonna lynch invisi? I can get on board with that, especially with Longshots story.
VOTE: UNVOTE
VOTE: INVISI
(Halp i dont know if thats the right way of doing it)
Your latest vote overwrites anyway so all you had to say was vote invisi.Maribro said:
LtLongshot said:
Really I'm uninclined to vote unless the quiet people post some more tbh.
Not lynching benefits the mafia, I've come to learn this from playing the game
This. Also how much do we believe his nk capabilities? He seemed very insistent that he should kill at night and we shouldnt lynch anyone. This means that its entirely his decision who dies and were none the wiser as it could have been 1 of any 3.
LtLongshot said:
Urisk said:It was originally suggested that I should kill someone to prove innocence which I'm ok with if it against super sus people. Which is why I proposed a no lynch option, unfortunately going back now invis did look really sus with those previous comments. The problem is, I have 2 kills which I really don't want wasted, so far it is still possible but not plauseable that there is another Town NK player.
SpaceJam said:
We gonna lynch invisi? I can get on board with that, especially with Longshots story.
VOTE: UNVOTE
VOTE: INVISI
(Halp i dont know if thats the right way of doing it)
Your latest vote overwrites anyway so all you had to say was vote invisi.Maribro said:
LtLongshot said:
Really I'm uninclined to vote unless the quiet people post some more tbh.
Not lynching benefits the mafia, I've come to learn this from playing the game
This. Also how much do we believe his nk capabilities? He seemed very insistent that he should kill at night and we shouldnt lynch anyone. This means that its entirely his decision who dies and were none the wiser as it could have been 1 of any 3.
Maribro said:
it's always been two kills, go back and read his post
SpaceJam said:yeah exactly this, it may or may not have been unclear to some people
He can use the ability twice, people assumed he can use it both times in one night.
Invisi said:
Um, I'm at work and I'm not really sure what's going on because I don't have time to read everything. I've been told you guys are about to kill me though, so please don't do that. Please don't kill me before I have a chance to work out what's going on, hopefully I'll have half an hour or so tonight.
To post on the Ausmash forums you must register